China Govermnet VS. Hong Kong Residents

In the article "China's Crackdown in Hong Kong" by The Editorial Board in opinion section of The New York Times it makes their argument that if China had followed their agreement before taking Britain control of Hong Kong all of the street protest could of have been avoided. The Pro-Democratic residents from Hong Kong are upset that China is trying to control every move that they make without fallowing their agreement. It has gotten to a point where Police officer have to use major techniques to try to control this residents. China government has shown no mercy against the protest and so far it is unknown how far they are willing to go. It also let us know that the US and the Britain government were what we called witness of this agreement and their part was to make sure that China would followed what it was agree but know either of them seem to show any interest in making sure of it. Now the China government its worry and putting energy and effort to stop the riot in Hong Kong but if they only had followed the agreement all of this could of had been avoided. Overall I think the article does a good job in making clear their point of  view and argument and it backs it up with examples and logic statements that make sense. Its not confusing its easy to understand and know what they are talking about without having any type of background of the article topic. It is a convincing article for the people that are in government and specially the ones in China and Hong Kong. I would say that I agree with the author of the article because it does a good job convincing me that what China is doing is wrong and that  it could of had been avoided. Its sad that Hong Kong has to go through this and that China is not stopping by anything. I feel like if they had an agreement it should of had been followed because to me that is like having honor in what you say you will do.